Download Windows Vista Enterprise SP2 (64 Bit) x64 (December 2010) torrent or any other torrent from the Applications Windows. Direct download via magnet link. Microsoft Security Bulletin MS14-066 - Critical. Windows Vista x64 Edition Service Pack 2 (2992611) Remote Code Execution. Kernel Patch Protection (KPP), informally known as PatchGuard, is a feature of 64-bit editions of Microsoft Windows that prevents patching the kernel. This is an introduction to Windows Vista and the x64 architecture. Uninformed bypassed the Patch Guard protection on Windows XP x64. Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate SP2 2016 Direct. Sylenth1 2.2.1 + Crack for Windows x64 x86 and. Moving to Windows Vista x64. Microsoft security products don't patch Vista's kernel either and use instead documented interfaces as everyone else. Windows Vista 64-bit Service Pack 1: Vista 64-bit SP1 (final release) driver download. All the latest manufacturer's drivers available for free from Software Patch. Hi, it’s Scott Field, Windows Security Architect, again. Microsoft recently became aware of a third party kernel mode driver named “Atsiv” which. Windows Vista SP2 64 Bit Retail serial numbers, cracks and keygens are presented here. No registration is needed. Just download and enjoy. Moving to Windows Vista x. Contents. This is an introduction to Windows Vista and the x. Writing an article like this is always uneasy, because there's plenty to talk about, but on the other hand it's an article, not a book. I tried to focus on some important aspects, but it goes without saying it that I had to cut out a lot (e. This is just a general overview on certain topics, if you want to learn more, then you should really consider turning to specific guides. Also, I won't talk about some obvious matters of the x. This article should be considered a quick upgrade for x. XP developers. At the time I write this article, I've been using Windows Vista for a month and its official release is scheduled for January 3. I moved to x. 64 with XP some months ago and at the time I did, I was surprised that I found all the drivers for my devices. But, as we know, Windows Vista requires drivers to be certified, and in order to get the certification companies have to supply a x. No certification will be released for x. However, at the moment I write, a lot of applications like virtual drive encrypters don't provide drivers for Vista (since x. If you didn't know about the certification, don't worry, I'll talk about it later and you'll see that it's still possible to run drivers without it. I just wanted to say that hardware compatibility is no longer an issue like it was one year ago, and by switching to Windows Vista x. I tried to organize this article in two sections, one about the changes brought us by x. Vista. I tried as hard as possible to separate these two things, because the x. Windows XP, so it was important to me that the reader was given a clear distinction between those things that affect only Vista and those ones which affect both topics. In this paragraph, I'll try to explain the basics of x. I assume the reader is already familiar with x. Moreover, since this is just a very (but very) brief guide, you'll have to look into the AMD6. Some stuff I won't even mention, you'll see by yourself that some instructions are no longer in use: for instance, that the lea instruction has completely taken place of the mov offset. What you're going to notice at once is that there are some more registers in the x. GPRs). 8 new 1. 28- bit XMM registers. Of course, all general- purpose registers are 6. The old ones we already knew are easy to recognize in their 6. These old registers can still be accessed in their smaller bit ranges, for instance: rax, eax, ax, ah, al. The new registers go from r. Here's a figure taken from the AMD docs: Applications can still use segments registers as base for addressing, but the 6. Here's another figure: And now, the most important things. Calling convention and stack. Thus, the stack frame is made of: the stack parameters, the registers parameters, the return address (which I remind you is a qword) and the local variables. The first parameter is the rcx register, the second one rdx, the third r. Saying that the parameters registers are part of the stack frame, makes it also clear that any function that calls another child function has to initialize the stack providing space for these four registers, even if the parameters passed to the child function are less than four. The initialization of the stack pointer is done only in the prologue of a function, it has to be large enough to hold all the arguments passed to child functions and it's always a duty of the caller to clean the stack. Now, the most important thing to understand how the space is provided in the stack frame is that the stack has to be 1. In fact, the return address has to be aligned to 1. So, the stack space will always be something like 1. Here's a small figure of a stack frame: Don't worry if you haven't completely figured out how it works: now we will see a few code samples, which, in my opinion, always make the theory a lot easier to understand. Let us take for instance a hello- world application like: int WINAPI . Since we are calling a child- function with parameters we need the space for all four parameter registers (0x. Thus, we'll have 0x. Remember that if the stack- value is too small or is not aligned, your code will crash at once. Also, don't wonder why there's no Exit. Process in this function: compiling the code above with Visual C++ adds always a stub (Win. Main. CRTStartup) which then calls our Win. Main. So, the Exit. Process is in the stub code. But what happens when the code before the Message. Box calls a function which takes seven parameters instead of four? So, 7 * 8 = 0x. 38, which aligned to 1. Providing, then, space for the return address makes it 0x. I think you have understood the stack- frames logic by now, it's actually quite easy to understand it, but it needs a second to revert from the old x. But now enough of this, now that we've seen how the x. Before we start, I have to make something clear. There are some assemblers over the internet which make the job easier, mainly because the initialize the stack by themselves or they create code that is easy to converto from/to x. But I think that is not the point here in this article. In fact, I'm going to use the Microsoft assembler (ml. Another option could be compiling the with another assembler and then link it with ml. I think the reader should really make these decisions on his own. As far as I am concerned, I don't believe that much code should be written in assembly and avoided whenever it could be done. This new x. 64 technology is a good opportunity to re- think about these matters. In the last years I always wrote 6. C/C++ (I mean unmanaged, of course) and when I had to recompile a project of 7. I didn't had to change one single line of code (I'll talk about the C/C++ programming later). Despite of all the macros an assembler offers, I seriously doubt that people who wrote their whole code in assembly will be able to switch so easily to x. IA6. 4 syntax could be adopted). I think in most cases the obvious choice will be not converting to the new technology and stick to x. The Microsoft assembler is contained in the SDK and in the DDK (WDK for Vista). Right now, I'm using Vista's WDK, which I freely downloaded from the MSDN. The first sample of code I'm going to show you is a simple Hello- World messagebox application. Message. Box. A : proc. Exit. Process : proc. Hello World!', 0. My First x. 64 Application', 0. Type = 0. lea r. 8, capt ; lp. Caption. lea rdx, body ; lp. Text. xor rcx, rcx ; h. Wnd = NULL. call Message. Box. A. xorecx, ecx ; exit code = 0. Exit. Process. end. Colourised in 3. 6ms. As you can see, I didn't bother unwinding the stack, since I call Exit. Process. The syntax is very similar to the old MASM one, although there are a few dissimilarities. The ml. 64 console output should be something like this: The command line to compile is: ml. C: \..\test. asm /link /subsystem: windows. C: \Win. DDK\6. 00. C: \Win. DDK\6. 00. Main. Colourised in 0ms. If the libs are not in the same directory as ml. I did. The entry has to be provided, otherwise you would have to use Win. Main. CRTStartup as main entry. The next sample of code I'm going to show you displays a window calling Create. Window. Ex. What you're going to learn through this code is structure alignment and how integrating resources in your projects. Like I said earlier, I don't want to encourage you to write your windows in assembly, but I believe that this sort of code is good for learning. Now the code, afterwards the explanation. Get. Module. Handle. A : proc. extrn Message. Box. A : proc. extrn Register. Class. Ex. A : proc. Create. Window. Ex. A : proc. extrn Def. Window. Proc. A : proc. Show. Window : proc. Get. Message. A : proc. Translate. Message : proc. Dispatch. Message. A : proc. extrn Post. Quit. Message : proc. Destroy. Window : proc. Exit. Process : proc. WNDCLASSEX struct. Size dd ? The reason why I avoided for other functions other than the main the proc macro is that the ml. I didn't want, by itself. Avoiding the macro made it possible to define my own stack frame without any intermission by the compiler. The first thing to notice scrolling this code is the structure: MSG struct. The reason, in a few words, is that qword members should be aligned to qword boundaries (this for the first padding). The additional padding at the end of the structure follows the rule that: every structure should be aligned to its largest member. So, being its largest member a qword, the structure should be aligned to an 8- byte boundary. To compile this sample, the command line is: ml. C: \Win. DDK\6. 00. C: \Win. DDK\6. 00. Main c: \myapp\test. Colourised in 0mstest. I took from a VC++ wizard project, I was too lazy to make on by myself. Anyway, making a resource file is very easy with the VC++, but no one forbids you to use the notepad, it just takes more time. To compile the resource file all you need to do is to use the command line: . I didn't cover everything with this paragraph, but now you should have quite a good insight into x. Let's move on. Writing x. C/C++ is very easy. All what it takes is to follow some basic rules. The most common mistake that make that makes 9. For Instance: ptr. DWORD) (sizoef (x) + ptr. Colourised in 3ms. This line of code assumes that pointers are 3. So, always cast like this: ptr. ULONG. The important thing is that you use one of these defines (or directly by pointer type: (void *)). Keep in mind that all handles and handle derivates are qwords. HANDLE, HKEY, HICON, HBITMAP, HINSTANCE, HMODULE, HWND, etc. These are all 6. 4bit long, even though they're not all the same handle (HINSTANCE, for example, is just a pointer, not a real handle). Even WPARAM and LPARAM are now 6. There's no rule to follow, just don't assume these types are 3. HWND *h. Wnd. Array = (HWND *) malloc(sizeof (DWORD) * n); < -- WRONG! Colourised in 3ms. Instead write: HWND *h. Wnd. Array = (HWND *) malloc(sizeof (HWND) * n); < -- RIGHT! Colourised in 3ms. As you can see this isn't a rule, just good sense. The defines to use for writing architecture- dependent code are.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |